so, i'm puzzled with the behaviour of configure on debian !!

well, you can comment the line,
but it's perfectly valid on any other
distributions
( i had a redhat at first, but now it evolved to something,
hum, else ... )) )

220hex wrote:
yes:

ldconfig -v|grep lame
        libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
        libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0

.gif

Wednesday February 26 2003 16:45, skrev Yves Degoyon:
is the location where it is installed is included
in /etc/ld.so.conf ??

does a 'ldconfig -v' includes the lame libraries ??

220hex wrote:
I reinstalled lame and libmp3lame from the source package, so here's what
I've got:

-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       376246 2002-06-30 18:04 libmp3lame.a
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          668 2002-06-30 18:04 libmp3lame.la
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           19 2003-02-26 01:11 libmp3lame.so
-> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           19 2003-02-25 23:47
libmp3lame.so.0 -> libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       347012 2003-02-25 23:47
libmp3lame.so.0.0.0

still not recognised from .configure...

.gif

Wednesday February 26 2003 15:36, skrev Yves Degoyon:
surely true !! tom !!

but that's really silly from debian.

cheers,

sevy/yves

Tom Schouten wrote:
for the lame issue, i think it doesn't find
libmp3lame which must be in a weird location
on debian ((

can't help you more from that distance )
maybe it has something to do with the fact that on debian, the
libmp3lame package has only static libararies?

-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       352520 Aug 16  2001 libmp3lame.a
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root          668 Aug 16  2001 libmp3lame.la



maybe AC_CHECK_LIB(mp3lame) does not include statics?