2012/6/20 Marian Weger mail@marianweger.com
Am 20.06.12 16:43, schrieb Фывапр Олджэвич:
so the thing with
[bang( | [tgl] | [sel 0]_____ |
[nmbrbox\ [nmbrbox\propsed by Tim , - is the solution, and I used such a thing, but I thought that the readymade object is more stable - thatswhy i recoded everything with [TogEdge] ..
is the [sel]-chain more stable in fast algorithms ?
i don't know [TogEdge], but the "[sel]-chain solution" is completely stable. replacing externals by built-in functions would also be more future-proof.
perhaps, it would be even more stable if no gui object is involved. the toggle could be replaced by a simple counter with modulo.
don't know if it matters if the tgl isn't visible, but i guess you could also use: [i ]X[== 0]
______________________________**_________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list