What do you mean? Some packages are being updated and have newer versions, some are abandoned and only have this version from the last pd-extended up there... but they're not all meant to be either in one group or another, and basically anyone can work on an abandoned library and update/upload a new version... 

 

Well, if they differ in version, it's good to know which version it is, if it's a newer version, an older version, the same version... I think it's really confusing if you do not know the version at all... you just can't compare! And you have to understand that most people looking at it cannot really grasp the idea that the package is "from the last extended package" - you can see the question from David as an example...

 

that's really uncommon, but why does it matter? You can still load and install the library.

Anyway, seems that deken can take any kind of information and display it. I get it that it's nice to have a clue that it's from extended, so, instead of "v0.0.extended" why not give it a proper version and also explicitly say it's from pd extended? Example suggestion;

instead of "cyclone-v0-0extended",
it could be "cyclone-v0.1alpha56-pd-extended"

would that be worse somehow?

cheers