I am sure this has been covered on this list before--if it is not too much
of a trouble where can one get the new version of cyclone?
Also, there are some improvements on pd-l2ork side of things that I've
implemented that may detract from Max behavior but also offers other
benefits. For instance, coll object can be threaded and as such allows
loading of large files without dropping samples, albeit at the expense of
determinacy, so one in these cases must rely on outputting done loading
bang signal before working with the cool object. This option is fully
backwards compatible and the default behavior is non-threaded. It would be
great if we could have those merged so that we don't have to maintain two
separate versions of the cyclone library.
Best,
--
Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A.
Associate Professor
Computer Music
ICAT Senior Fellow
Director -- DISIS, L2Ork
Virginia Tech
School of Performing Arts – 0141
Blacksburg, VA 24061
(540) 231-6139
ico@vt.edu
www.performingarts.vt.edu
disis.icat.vt.edu
l2ork.icat.vt.edu
Ico.bukvic.net
this has been corrected in the new cyclone library
actually, both cartopol~ and poltocar~ were "wrong" in the same way, but
for extended 0.42 only poltocar~ was corrected, this incomplete fix ended
up ruining spectral processing that was actually working before that.
get the new cyclone, many objects are being corrected
cheers
2015-10-16 18:14 GMT-03:00 Gilberto Agostinho via Pd-list <
pd-list@lists.iem.at>:
> Just a little update: the problem is with [cartopol~], its rightmost
> outlet is outputting the correct value multiplied by -1.
>
>
> On 16/10/15 22:55, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I believe I found a bug with the objects [cartopol~] and [poltocar~].
>> Basically, if I would connect both outlets of [cartopol~] to the inlets of
>> [poltocar~], I would expect to receive the same values as I would input.
>> The problem is that the output of the second outlet of [poltocar~] is
>> multiplied by -1! I tested this with both Pd 0.46.5 and pd-extended 0.43.4
>> (and this bug isn't present in Pd-l2Ork).
>>
>> Here is an image of the problem:
>>
http://s1.postimg.org/bs79w4d5b/Screenshot_from_2015_10_16_22_50_23.png
>>
>> Is this a known bug?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gilberto
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
