Am 01.04.2009 um 16:45 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
despite of my sarcasm: have you considered using [pix_buffer] rather
than [pix_multiimage]; it is way more flexible. (e.g. if all the images can fit into ram, you don't even need a
harddisk)
thanks for the hint, i'll try it out.
m.