Awesome, thank you. I'm glad we could figure it out. I remember checking a few times and we discussed this in libpd. I kept getting confused by the different licenses.
On Oct 6, 2013, at 3:55 AM, Miller Puckette msp@ucsd.edu wrote:
OK... done and pushed to git repo.
cheers M
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 12:18:23PM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
Hmm... Looking back in the git repo i saw:
commit 42f3e5f8dbc60ad644e9f8a1c5b61d1847e19470 Author: Miller Puckette msp@ucsd.edu Date: Thu Nov 3 11:40:35 2011 -0700
change expr~ source to LGPL license (with IRCAM"s permission :)
I had quite forgotten about this (and still can't remember this ever having happened) but here's the e-mail I got from Shahrokh:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 02:50:53AM -0700, Shahrokh Yadegari wrote:
Dear Max and Miller,
I got news from IRCAM that they are willing to release expr code on LGPL. Will that solve the current licensing problems?
Max, could you communicate to the list and let me know what they think
about
this. I hope this helps.
thanks, Shahrokh
So I think we're in the clear (although I hope Shahrokh kept the mail from IRCAM authorizing this!)
I'll go on and change the source over here so that it appears in the git repo. (This will take some time as I first want to merge my 0.45 fixes into 'master'.)
cheers Miller
Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com