On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:25 AM, cyrille henry
<ch@chnry.net> wrote:
hello,
you can use multiple pd instance, or use pd~ objects.
This 2 solution aimed to have 2 (or more) pd running.
the 2nd solution is great since all pd instance are synchronized at audio rate.
The 1st is better if some instances can slow down, so that it did not slow the others.
The main bottleneck is the communication between this process.
for audio communication, prefer pd~ solution.
for huge data communication, i don't find both approach very good.
for image communication, i successfully use pix_share_read and pix_share_write object (for both solution).
cheers
Cyrille
Le 30/08/2011 11:11, Jean-Marie Adrien a écrit :
Hello list
Im pushing a Mac quite a lot with image analysis + audio and id like to know if there is a simple way to use efficiently the multiprocessors.
Ive read through a recent paper by Miller concerning multiprocessing, but is there somewhere a manual :) ? Something practical for a basic user ?
Would running two instances of PD (one processing image and the other sound, with some internal bus link) be a good trick ?
Anyone gone along this way ?
Thanks
JM
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
______________________________
_________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list