Re: [PD] very compressed chip sounds

wops. this was meant for the list...

On 08/10/2011 22:21, Björn Eriksson wrote:

Here attached a try to use less objects... ended up with 9 objects.

Nice! But... it's not vanilla (I think) due to the [sin~] :-)

So.. I wasn't thinking of using (pseudo)randomness (noise)... Otherwise one could do something like the attached.. (7 objects including [dac~])

Lorenzo

/Björn Eriksson

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Lorenzo Sutton <lsutton@libero.it mailto:lsutton@libero.it> wrote:

Hey Chris,

Thanks for this really interesting!


On 07/10/2011 14:25, Chris McCormick wrote:

    <http://countercomplex.__blogspot.com/2011/10/__algorithmic-symphonies-from-__one-line-of.html
    <http://countercomplex.blogspot.com/2011/10/algorithmic-symphonies-from-one-line-of.html>>

    Surely we can do stuff like this in Pd?

    Smallest Pd patch that makes an interesting tune?


Depending on your definition of 'interesting' I made these two. I
guess they can be considered rather minimal (under 16 objects per
patch excluding comments and including [dac~]...)
The principle is basically the same in both patches.

Lorenzo.



    Chris.

    -------------------
    http://mccormick.cx

    _________________________________________________
    Pd-list@iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@iem.at> mailing list
    UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
    http://lists.puredata.info/__listinfo/pd-list
    <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>



_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@iem.at> mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list