yep, same here.
On 16 Oct 2017, at 01:29, hans w. koch hansw.koch@gmail.com wrote:
sorry to be dense..how´s that supposed to work? trying to recreate the ascii patch doesn´t yield aynthing here except 0
:-(
hans
Am 15.10.2017 um 19:59 schrieb IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at:
On 10/14/2017 10:51 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
no, I mean Pd's "global" sample rate, not an audio file's rate
well, my answer was specifically about the "global" sample rate, not about audio files.
if you are running Pd at 44.1kHz, then the following prints out "44100", even if run in an up- or downsampled subpatch:
[write -nframes 0 . foo( | [soundfiler] [t f] [print]which i think is what you asked for.
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list