hello, I had plans to try working on a .c code for it, and my idea was to just adapt from [comb~].

Yeah... Teeth is almost identical to [comb~]!

In [comb~] you have the same delay time for the feedforward and the feedback. In [teeth~] you can specify different time delays for feedforward and feedback. So you basically have only one extra time delay parameter to include in [comb~] and... voilà, you've got [teeth~]!

Hope this makes it clear for you.

Cheers 

2015-06-23 4:56 GMT-03:00 Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan@xs4all.nl>:
Hi Alexandre,

Just now I completed the c code for a teeth~ object, which doesn't seem
to crash instantly and sounds* the same as your abstraction which is now
in cyclone.

The block diagram in your help patch made it very clear what should  be
coded. The only thing (what an expert told me), was that 'z' applies to
samples, and teeth~ is controlled in milli-seconds.

While coding, I found the delay time has to be zero or positive, but the
gain coefficients can be negative too, adding the delayed signal out of
phase.

I have no plans to add the object to cyclone anytime soon. First spend
some time figuring out that i really does what I think it does. It
doesn't crash instantly, and output looks sinusoid with a sinus input,
but that doesn't prove much. And at least some form of interpolation
should be added before it is ready for prime time.

Greetings,

Fred Jan

*) the help patch sounds equally weird with both, using only the
positive gains

On 2015-06-15 04:14 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> it's just a preview, I'm gonna still work on them and help files :)
>
> 2015-06-15 10:38 GMT-03:00 Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan@xs4all.nl
> <mailto:fjkraan@xs4all.nl>>:
>
>     Hi Alexandre,
>
>     Thanks for the abstractions. I will include them in the svn repository
>     and the next binary deken compatible builds. Only rect~ didn't work.
>
>     I applied some minor modification by replacing [pi], which doesn't
>     appear to be vanilla by [3.141593(.
>
>     Greetings,
>
>     Fred Jan
>
>     P.S. Wouldn't mind if the future supplied help-patches were already
>     cyclone-standard formatting ;-).
>
>     On 2015-06-14 10:14 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>     >> Any object or abstraction that implements something
>     >> present in Max(5) could be part of cyclone.
>     >
>     > i've made 13 abstractions so far
>     >
>     > - atodb
>     > - atodb~
>     > - dbtoa
>     > - dbtoa~
>     > - freqshift~
>     > - rect~
>     > - saw~
>     > - scale
>     > - scale~
>     > - teeth~
>     > - thresh~
>     > - tri~
>     > - trunc~
>     >
>     > Gonna try and do a few of these more, I have more 5 in mind so far. I
>     > guess some make much more sense as objects, like
>     [rect~]/[tri~]/[saw~].
>     > Here's a preview attached.
>     >
>     > cheers
>
>