11 Dec
2017
11 Dec
'17
9:45 p.m.
- IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at [2017-12-11 12:05]:
On 2017-12-11 10:19, Peter P. wrote:
- IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at [2017-12-10 18:56]:
On 12/10/2017 04:40 PM, Peter P. wrote:
[pix_snap] + [pix_buffer] + [makefilename]
So [pix_write] cound become an abstraction that holds the above objects maybe.
patches/PRs welcome.
Just curious, if [pix_write] would become an abstraction as described avove how would one do the encoding of still images saved from [pix_buffer] into a (compressed) video file without using external tools (ffmpeg, mencoder) then?
price question: how would you do that with [pix_write] as a binary (as is now)?
Sorry, mixed it up with [pix_record].