> "So, SMS is signicantly slower because it uses ASCII conversion ?
> Interesting. Even at high baud rates ?"
SMS is aimed at ease of use and precision. Although I am surprised to ear about SMS's and Pduino's speed problems.
I made an installation with an SSC-32 servo controller controlling 24 servos connected to PD. The SSC-32 is based on the SAME chip as the Arduino and uses a communication protocol VERY similar to SMS and I never experienced any problems.
Maybe you are not keeping your messages simple enough?
Or maybe the big difference was that I was using a hardware serial port and not a USB>Serial chip/converter.
Tom
Hi,
2007/6/21, tim <info@timvets.net>:
>
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 09:21 -0400, Alexandre Quessy wrote:
>
> Hi!
> I don't want to insist... but a task like this would be much easier
> with the
> http://www.arduino.cc/playground/Code/SimpleMessageSystem
> than with something not-as-flexible like Pduino.
>
> I agree to that.
> We did something similar a while ago, with realys, shift-registers and 13
> solenoids.
> It was fairly easy to make one firmware for pd communication with SMS as
> well as shifting code to drive the relays.
> More complex passages showed some timing fluctuation, but overall timing
> was pretty good.
> Polyphony was kept at a maximum of 4, above that, things became more
> unstable.
So, SMS is signicantly slower because it uses ASCII conversion ?
Interesting. Even at high baud rates ?
> In case you're interested, see
> www.timvets.net/projects/erkiandtim/poltergeist
> We obviously were more inclined to drink beer than to shoot film that
> night...;)
Error 404 !
a
>
> Tim
>
--
Alexandre Quessy
http://alexandre.quessy.net
http://www.puredata.info/Members/aalex
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list