I meant myself, for example - and everyone who doesn't do Pd fulltime, thus cannot really afford to learn using the more complicated parts/methods. So to say, the barriers to entry shall be kept low.
Nearly none of the Pd professionals use Pd «fulltime».
Yeah. The question is, do you understand the point I was trying to make with my less professional English? Then I'm also interested if you agree with it.
I don't necessarily... « à temps plein » or « full time » means as a main occupation. The definition is variable, but in my country, this is normally assumed to mean 30 hours per week in a sustained way, especially 50 weeks per year. Even when including all the non-patching activities that revolve around Pd or mostly-Pd projects, very few Pd professionals put that much time in Pd. Are there any at all ?
If you don't mean that, then it's probably not a matter of your skills of English, but rather about stating your opinion precisely enough.
But yes, I agree with what I think that you are saying. But I think that there is a continuüm of time investment that gradually makes the learning more worth the effort, and it begins at a tiny amount of part-time such as just a few hours per week.
| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC