Hi Alexandre,
> Hi, I re-sending (or forwarding) my first message about cartopol, with
> the patch I had attached to exemplify the issue. My message was brief
> then, but it said it all.
>
The message was clear, surely with the additional info. Attached is an
image of your patch with a modified poltocar~.
>
> Now, I'm assuming that the version in 0.43 is the latest and is the one
> you have. About the bug list then, the right thing to do would be to
> take [cartopol~] out of the list and just keep [poltocar~], saying
> something like "wrong conversion".
The source I am using is some 0.44 version. The final code patch should
be based on the svn code. Not much difference is to be expected here.
>
> I haven't checked the code. But the formulas are pretty simple, just
> basically sine and cosine, so you can't go wrong by fixing it. There
> must be a minus sing somewhere where it didn't belong, just take it out.
Indeed it is (poltocar.c:35):
*out2++ = -am * sinf(ph); /* CHECKED */
Removing the minus and recompiling made your patch work as expected.
Added some info to the sourceforge bug "#1128 still on cartopol~ /
poltocar~".
>
> Cheers
Greetings,
Fred Jan
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Alexandre Torres Porres* <porres@gmail.com <mailto:porres@gmail.com>>
> Date: 2014-12-08 20:37 GMT-02:00
> Subject: Re: [PD] Cyclone suite initiative
> To: Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan@xs4all.nl <mailto:fjkraan@xs4all.nl>>
> Cc: pd-list@mail.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@mail.iem.at>
>
> cartopol~ and poltocar~ are also buggy
>
> I pointed it out once, but only cartopol~ was corrected and it made it
> worse. check atatchment.
>
> do you have this covered?
>
> cheers
>
> 2014-12-08 14:30 GMT-02:00 Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan@xs4all.nl
> <mailto:fjkraan@xs4all.nl>>:
>
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> Next to working on the help-patches, I am working on creating such a
> list. I'll put it somewhere public when the patches are done.
>
> So when you find any others, I would like to know.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Fred Jan
>
> > hi, you probably know about this bug, but [rand~]'s argument doesn't
> > really work. I'd be happy to help find other bugs, do you have a
> list of
> > bugs you're working on?
> >
> > cheers
> >
>
>