2016-06-15 5:09 GMT-03:00 Peter P. <peterparker@fastmail.com>:

Orm's implementation of the random phase might also be cheaper than your two fexpr~ for that part.

it's just "expr~" not "fexpr~" ;)

 

You might not have to be conservative with CPU
usage in your case at all however.

nope, and I need to be more intuitive (as this is a didactic material) and I consider this to be "simpler" - subjective 

 

It does work and might save cpu compared to fexpr~.

biquad~ is surely cheaper than fexpr~ !!! 

 

In my case I am trying a textbook implementation for now.

yep, that's what I was going for in that example, what you think? If you have more remarks other than efficiency, I'd like to know. 

cheers

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list