On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:06 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig
<zmoelnig@iem.at> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
would you mind explaining what the "strange behaviour" is?
personally i don't feel very interested in being directed to some 3rd
party homepage that tracks my surfing habits, phishes for my credit
card number and eats babies for breakfast, just to discover that you
forgot to use [trigger].
also, usually Pd patches are small enough to be attached to an email.
if the patch does get bigger, you should probably try to trim down the
problem to a simple patch that still exhibits the problem (if it's
impossible to do that, chances are high that the bug is somewhere else).
and Pd files are text only, so they compress very well.
otoh, it's rather thoughtful to only send that big data once and not
to every member of the list....
others might feel differently of course.
fgamsdr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlBzzNsACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRmawCfbzmbzgHMI0P86EXSTK7J0byd
uE4AnR2ibLFOpTroa/5IvalnNrREobGP
=1Gwz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list