On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:57:23 +0100 zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
Quoting Andy Farnell padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk:
Thankyou Frank. Remember we talked about problems that happen using more than one [r~]. Was that to do with creation order? Or is that something that only affects [throw~][catch~] pairs?
Maybe it was just me misusing [s~], if you create more than one [s~] with the same argument then only the last one created works.
Yes, I understand that Iohannes, the remark is about the behaviour you get if you don't understand and misuse [s~][r~]. It surprised me that it accepted the instance and replaced the old one.
cheers,
Andy
that is what "one-to-many" means: exactly one(1) [send~] and
many(many) [receive~] objects.mfg.asd IOhannes
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list