29 Jun
2010
29 Jun
'10
2:57 p.m.
On 2010-06-29 14:46, Bernardo Barros wrote:
2010/6/29 Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org:
In this view, Miller has the biggest balls of dem all. :)
Is there a legal reason for PD not be GPL?
is there a need for a legal (as opposed to other) reason? maybe there are people, who simply find GPL too restrictive (in terms of freedom).
Maybe it has some code from another project?
maybe another project that is fundamentally incompatible with GPL has some code of Pd in it.
mfgadfrt IOhannes