>From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig@iem.at> >To: Luisa Lamas <luisalamas@hotmail.com> >CC: pd-list@iem.at >Subject: Re: [PD] Gem-bin-0.90.1 >Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:57:58 +0100 > >Luisa Lamas wrote: >>But I have the gem-0.87 already installed I suppose that I must >>install the previous one the gem-0.90.0 and then the upgrade for >>gem-0.90.1 is only one file (gem.dll). Am I correct ? >> >>Sorry I have fear to do mistakes and have to begin all the extras >>and libraries that I have installed... >> >ok, sorry for being so cryptic > >when you download the "full" version of Gem (without sources, for >windows) you will get a Gem.dll and some folders with >reference-patches and other documentation (example patches) >up till now, Gem is only an external library, it has no abstractions >(this will most probably change in the future) > >so to run gem-0.90.1 it is sufficient to have the correct Gem.dll >if you want the documentation too (while the functionality has not >changed, almost all of the reference-patches have been rewritten for >0.90) you will need to download it. > > >so in short: >1.) you need the Gem.dll (if you are on windos) for 0.90.1 >2.) you might want the optional documentation > > >caveat: >there is no bundle that consists of both the 0.90.1-binary and the >documentation > > >so what to do: > >install it by hand: >1. get the binary http://gem.iem.at/download/gem-bin-0.90.1.zip >2. get the documentation (without binary) >http://gem.iem.at/download/gem-doc-0.90.0.zip > > >of course you are free to get the bin+doc-bundle >http://gem.iem.at/download/gem-bin-doc-0.90.0.zip >install as instructed >then replace the 0.90.0 Gem.dll with the 0.90.1 one > > >sounds complicated ? >probably it is...... > > >mfg.asd.r >IOhannes > >prize question: what would be the free windows installer of choice ? > > > >_______________________________________________ >PD-list@iem.at mailing list >UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list