man,
admitting there are so-called imaginery numbers and that it makes sense because it has a reflexion ( a projection ) back in reality, it means the 'reality' is actually a projection by itself of something that has more than 3 dimensions.
.it looks like believing in magic and the paranormal, that's why i liked maths and physics for a while.
then, they asked to build motors, and i just left )
saludos, sevy
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
By the same token, any number times itself is non-negative. i breaks existing rules too. (lol)
You know, I could just have said, oh, since you're multiplying i times i the result is negative, by definition, and accepted that it works.
I could just be the kid who writes down what the teacher says and memorizes it for the test, instead of asking questions. I suspect there is something else at work for the result to be correct, because the only reason given for using i was to represent the vertical axis.
At no point was there actually a quantity of -1, for which we found the root before multiplying by the second part of the complex number.-Chuckk