ok, so now I see that snapshot~ may output values in the same rate as vsnapshot~ but it'll only output the last sample of a block, and won't work for block sizes less than 64 in size

so yeah, the idea of a vsnapshot~ seems nice, and seems to work fine, what would the bugs be?

cheers

2015-06-28 2:21 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>:
Ok, and you know what? I've been making tests, and it seems [snapshot~] is just doing the same job as [vsnapshot~], so I'm not sure if there's a case it is needed.

Since you are thinking about getting it to work, let me ask, what would it be needed for?

cheers

2015-06-28 1:33 GMT-03:00 Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu>:
Better not play with it - it's not well designed and I want to put it out to
pasture once I or someone can design a correct one.

cheers
Miller

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 12:22:03AM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> Could anyone tell me a use they have for [vsnapshot~]? Trying to make a
> good example to explain its purpose, thanks

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list