Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 15:28 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Batuhan Bozkurt wrote:
Yes Martin, you are right. The purpose of 99999999 number there was to make the maxsize as big as possible(one more digit and soundfiler was returning an error message afair). But I think I can load files that are bigger than 16777215 samples long(which makes approx. 6.3 minutes of 44.1kHz mono file). I'll check tonight and report.
What we're saying is that, even if you can do it, many objects will fail at supporting you in the reading of that data.
and when reading from a table (at least with the tabread~ objects) in that area, it will sound bad, because the index jumps from even to even number or, in higher ranges, only from multiples of 4 to multiples of 4 etc. in short: it'll sound bad. that is why using huge tables isn't a good idea, anyway.
roman
Yes, I've tried how it works in an isolated way and you are right. thanks Batuhan