I should have also added that I'm only using this functionality for relatively small arrays (500 values), and haven't tried using it for arrays which may be holding longish audio samples.
 
-Stephen

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Stephen Lucas <s9lucas@gmail.com> wrote:
Just putting in my 2cents, but I've been using the bonus feature of being able to write an array's contents to a text file with a message and then read it back out to a different array with another message.
 
This is probably ok for my usage, since I have a project where I need to store lots of arrays in text files anway, but it's certainly a really easy solution in terms of code.
 
-Stephen

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Frank Barknecht <fbar@footils.org> wrote:
Hallo,
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:

> I've been using this a lot recently as well, but I don't think, Miller's
> undocumented suggestion can replace this in all cases. One advantage of the
> bang~->switch~ approach is - I believe - that it gets rid of many function

I meant to write "[bang~]->[0(->[switch~]" here.

Ciao
--
Frank

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list