> Can you elaborate?

Not easily I'm afraid, so I'll try to keep it simple: it's a demonstration on the relationship between FM and waveshaping, compare now both patches in my new example. The waveshaping does not change through time.

But let me attempt to reason why it should keep static - it's like any other FM patch, once you have set the parameters, the waveform must be static and not change in time. My tests with supercollider and Max had a good result (waveform kept static). I also tried in Pd with cycle~ and in the newest vanilla.

cheers

2015-11-21 11:26 GMT-02:00 Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com>:

On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 02:59 -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> howdy, attached there's a patch where I was experimenting with FM
>
>
> the waveform shouldn't change with time, but it does. Give it a while
> though, 30 seconds is enough to hear a change in tone quality, then
> resseting the oscillator phase brings it back to where it was
>
>
> don't know why it does come out of phase, an equivalent patch in SC
> and Max does not get out of phase...

I hear and see what you mean. Interesting question. Frankly, I don't
quite understand why it is expected to stay in phase. Can you elaborate?

Roman

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list