On 01/10/2014 12:50 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote:
I don't have any plans, I was only responding in a hypothetical manner. I'm busy on a show right now and can't do pd dev. A better person to ask is Miller ...

I must have misunderstood-- the way you wrote that made it sound like there is a process by which the community gets things included into Pd Vanilla.  If such a process existed wouldn't one of the "dupes" IOhannes cites already be included in Pd Vanilla after over a decade now?

Instead, I think Pierre has taken the only sensible approach to making a library that works with both Pd-Vanilla and Pd-extended.  You simply code up the stuff that's been missing forever-- some of it probably in less time than it takes to respond to questions about "dupes".  Then you ship the library, and it "just works" without users having to find other libraries.

-Jonathan


On Jan 10, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika@yahoo.com> wrote:

What is your plan for getting the necessary features into Vanilla so that such dupes are no longer necessary to include in a library like this?

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika