its not really about decorations it about
helpful graphical content . useless decorations are not what java would
be used for . in my mind , java is a nice programming language in the same
vien of pd , simple to program [alot simpler then tcl/tk] and its object
oriented which resembles pd's paradigm of objects. then again i have never
worked with tcl/tk to any extent but from what i see it looks very mangaled
and not very "friendly" .
graphics in Java has always been the weak point,
this is what i mean by helpful graphical
content : a language like python or java , is graphically helpful when you
see the text its some what more intuitive for a person who has programmed
in c/c++ to follow the code and then to take there hand at modifing it as
they see fit .
Also i think the tcl/tk windowing graphics
can be a bit *raw* for new comers to pd to get into it right off the bat
. i know lots of peoplt who buy apple computers to run Max/MSP [well that
and the documentation helps too] . i mean most people that use a program
like pd are not hardcore programmers , they are artists that have a strong
background in computers and wish to do some cool/interesting/playful project
with computers that perhaps they couldnt do any other way .
i also know some artists who like the aesthetic of PD's appearance . . .
any how , i would like to hear more
about what you and every one else thinks about tcl/tk and why its the way
to go for pd's gui editor . i personally would like to try my hand at implementing
a java alternative for pd with extensive class stuctures that can be easily
documented [javadoc] , maintained and modified by any one with experience
in OO programming .
lot of work ahead !!! but, if you loose