Well, I ended up simply reverting to the old behavior but leaving a hook in
so that users can specifically ask only to open a patch once.

cheers
M

On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 12:10:01AM +0200, Antoine Rousseau wrote:
> Yes I realized that. So it should be something more specific.
> Why not a wider scope object, like [pdconfig], that would take "once" as an
> argument?
>
> Antoine Rousseau
>   http://www.metalu.net <http://metalu.net> __
> http://www.metaluachahuter.com/
> <http://www.metaluachahuter.com/compagnies/al1-ant1/>
>
>
>
> Le sam. 22 sept. 2018 ?? 23:55, Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com> a ??crit :
>
> > On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 23:29 +0200, Antoine Rousseau wrote:
> > > Of course [once] would be much better than [lock]....
> >
> > [once] is taken by iemlib. Not that I think every library in existence
> > should be considered regarding name conflicts when introducing new
> > objects to Pd, but I feel that [once] is in wide use and adding a
> > [once] with totally different behavior would be a bold move.
> >
> > Roman_______________________________________________
> > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list