Le 19/02/2011 20:49, Pedro Lopes a écrit :no, it's not considered as a bug.
>yes, this is known.
By known you mean.. Is it on the bug tracker already?
dynamic patching is not officially supported.
When such things are discovered (and by things I mean issues), shouldn't they be documented inside the help patches?
if issues are discovered (and by this i mean bug), they should be post on the bug tracker, to be corrected.
c
It helps a lot those getting inside pd.
Best,
pedro
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:44 PM, cyrille henry <ch@chnry.net <mailto:ch@chnry.net>> wrote:Pd-list@iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@iem.at> mailing list
hello,
yes, this is known.
you have to explicitly send the loadbang, like in this patch, using your exemple.
(don't know about initbang, i don't use it)
c
Le 19/02/2011 20:33, John Harrison a écrit :
is it correct behavior that loadbang will not be called when it is part of a dynamically created object? See attached. If you load test-do, it will create an instance of test when you click on the message. Test should print loadbang and initbang, but it only prints initbang.
--
John
_______________________________________________Pd-list@iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@iem.at> mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________contact: pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt <mailto:pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
Pedro Lopes (MSc)
website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes / http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ | http://twitter.com/plopesresearch
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list