On Wed, 4 May 2005, B. Bogart wrote:
should we be talking about this on pd-dev or pd-list?!?!
I don't know, I told my "documentation team" :-) to subscribe to pd-dev so that they could follow about PDDP, but I don't recall whether they're on pd-list.
It seems that if one wants to follow what s/he wants about pd, s/he has to be subscribed to all lists, because it's rarely really clear which list a discussion should be on; and given some people don't subscribe to all lists, often posters will compensate by crossposting, and so there isn't that much of a benefit of having eight separate m-l's.
I'm thinking of pd-list, pd-dev, pd-announce, pd-ot, pdweb, gem-dev, pf-list, gridflow-dev.
What do you think?
(should I crosspost this mail to pd-dev ? just kidding)
,-o---------o---------o---------o-. ,---. irc.freenode.net #dataflow |
| The Diagram is the Program (TM) | | ,-o-------------o--------------o-.
-o--------------o--------------o-' | | Mathieu Bouchard (Montréal QC) | | téléphone: +1.514.383.3801---' `-o-- http://artengine.ca/matju -'