19 Jul
2015
19 Jul
'15
9:59 p.m.
On 07/19/2015 09:55 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
And I don't see how it wouldn't work if the table had its contents saved, for example...
have the [partconv~] object be created before the [table]?
in any case: a table saving its own content is an edge case. if your [partconv~] only works with tables that have in-patch-data, i would consider it broken (=> more broken than it currently is).
... storing table data within patches doesn't scale well: among other things it uses the second most inefficient storage format and doesn't allow to use different data in multiple instances...
fmsdr IOhannes