Hi Seb,
On 08/09/15 14:47, s p wrote:
so I chose pragmatism over purity
That makes a lot of sense. You thought carefully about the best implementation with regards to the tradeoffs - my apologies for not seeing that.
> I only hope to persuade you that faithfulness to Pd's output is
probably a feature that users will appreciate a lot.
to conclude ... you don't need to persuade me of this :) I just think it
is more important to have something you can use at all. But the future
might be brighter, and maybe these two goals won't contradict each other
any more.
\o/
You're absolutely right that a WebPd that can run some patches without 100% sample-level accuracy is better than one which can't run on many devices at all, and your new approach sounds like a win on all platforms.
Thanks for your hard work on WebPd.
Cheers,
Chris.
--
http://mccormick.cx/