Thanks a lot for sharing this mix with those of us who can't afford travelling that far. It is a beautiful piece, with a meaningful dialog between the violon and the computer part, (also beautiful alone).
<snip>
This combination of licenses is for software (Perl in this case), Although it is called "Artistic", it was not designed to help distributing content. I would suggest to use a Creative Commons license. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3716218.stm http://creativecommons.org/ Maybe the new sampling license is appropriate for soundfonts? http://creativecommons.org/license/sampling --
Thank you very much for your kind compliments! As per your suggestion, I will look into the creative commons license more closely in order to see whether such packaging should prove to be more appropriate.
Best wishes,
Ivica Ico Bukvic, composer & multimedia sculptor http://meowing.ccm.uc.edu/~ico/