yes, I totally agree but I was curious about the technical aspects and not necessarily about the development process that naturally has to
Niklas Klügel wrote:
about the issues of explicitely threading parts of the graph (that came up in the discussion lateron), i must say i don't get why you would want to do it.
Because it's cheaper to implement.
If well done, it's also an intermediate step towards automatic threading. It's important to cut hard goals into easier goals, because it reduces required investment and gives quicker returns.
well, afair an algorithm for the optimal solution would be in NP anyway. if a suboptimal solution is enough, i think you can use it in a realtime
Also, I wouldn't trust automatic threading to make use of the CPUs in the best possible way all of the time, *especially* for real-time.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list