It's a bad design that it on,y allows up to one block of 'history' - it needs
to be rewritten to use a delay line (or something like that).  Also it should
allow interpolation, I think as an option.

Better not use it - any change that 'fixes' it will be incompatible!

cheers
Miller

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 04:55:31AM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> ok, so now I see that snapshot~ may output values in the same rate as
> vsnapshot~ but it'll only output the last sample of a block, and won't work
> for block sizes less than 64 in size
>
> so yeah, the idea of a vsnapshot~ seems nice, and seems to work fine, what
> would the bugs be?
>
> cheers
>
> 2015-06-28 2:21 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>:
>
> > Ok, and you know what? I've been making tests, and it seems [snapshot~] is
> > just doing the same job as [vsnapshot~], so I'm not sure if there's a case
> > it is needed.
> >
> > Since you are thinking about getting it to work, let me ask, what would it
> > be needed for?
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > 2015-06-28 1:33 GMT-03:00 Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu>:
> >
> >> Better not play with it - it's not well designed and I want to put it out
> >> to
> >> pasture once I or someone can design a correct one.
> >>
> >> cheers
> >> Miller
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 12:22:03AM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> >> > Could anyone tell me a use they have for [vsnapshot~]? Trying to make a
> >> > good example to explain its purpose, thanks
> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> >> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >>
> >>
> >