1 Jul
2006
1 Jul
'06
11:29 p.m.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
we use such approaches for most of our CPU-hungry applications (like the CUBEmixer), although we don't use OSC but netsend/netreceive: less processing overhead involved at the cost of non-compatibility with other appications
Acutally I did this the other way around: I was forced to use OSC instead of netsend because netsend stalled one of the two Pds running, threw it off the jack graph and did other nasty things. So I just
interesting and good to know. thanks
however, there was one reason a forgot why we used netsend instead of OSC: it is built-in...
mfg.asdr IOhannes