On 24 Mar 2003, Michael Hackl wrote:
Hi
http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT8906594941.html
some details and tests about the chances of the kernel interrupting pd preemptive patch / low-latency patch
Has anyone experience with a kernel with both patches applied and pd?
If you want to run pd together with jack the patches are definitely necessary, otherwise jack will not run without producing underruns.
Especially the low-latency patch improves the situation a lot on a loaded system (e.g. if you want to read/write from harddisk in you patch).
Guenter
ciao Michael plankton labs
Am Son, 2003-03-23 um 13.09 schrieb Frank Barknecht:
Hallo, Andre Schmidt hat gesagt: // Andre Schmidt wrote:
i used "chmod +s /usr/local/bin/pd" as "su" then runned:
huolong@linux:~> pd -alsa -alsadev 1,2 -nomidi -rt Sample width set to 2 bytes priority 96 scheduling enabled. memory locking enabled. priority 98 scheduling enabled. memory locking enabled.
pd starts and audio worx... so, does my suse8.1 have a RT kernel or is pd just emulating
Pd runs with "realtime" even on an unpatched plain vanilla kernel. The low latency patches just lower the chances, that the kernel itself will interrupt you audio processing.
ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list