2018-05-08 18:05 GMT-03:00 Martin Peach <chakekatzil@gmail.com>:On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com> wrote:...I personally cannot think of any use case where someone relies on pow(-1, 2) generating "0", it just seems wrong to me (i.e. a bug) and allowing it to do that wouldn't break things.Maybe add another outlet for the imaginary part?but simply pow(-1, 2) does not generate an imaginary part, right?