Yep, all your surmises are right.
cheers M
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:24:58PM +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 13:50 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
Yes
Cool.
but not with perfect accuracy.
I don't mind.
You have to make a histogram of the samples (choosing some bin size;
Forgive my ignorance, but how can I create a histogram out of an unordered set of samples? Do I just iterate over all samples "manually" and count up the bin depending on in which bin it falls?
that's what limits accuracy) and then array qualtile will do exactly what you're looking for.
So [array quantile] is meant to be used on a histogram of the raw data, as opposed to the raw data directly? That's why it returns something that looks like an index, namely the index of the bin of your histogram?
I use it for instance to do automatic level setting. I ask for the 90% quamtile of env~ output (in dB) over a period of 10 seconds or so.
Thanks, this I understand and is very similar to the stuff I'm interested in.
Roman
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 02:46:29PM +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
Hi all
I am having difficulty understanding the output of [array quantile]. From the help-file it seems it expects an input between 0 and 1, and also the values in the array should be in that range. The output seems to be in the range between 0 and <array-size> - 1. But what does it mean?
Can I use this somehow to achieve this:
I have n samples and input q while 0 < q < 1. I would like to know the value x for which q*100 percent samples are smaller than x and (1- q)*100 percent bigger.
Thanks, Roman
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list