Hallo, Enrique Erne hat gesagt: // Enrique Erne wrote:
sometimes people send patches to pd-list without license comment.
the question is: can i use the patches and publish it again under gnu/lgpl ?
Hm, GPL already is a quite specific license, which, although I like it, might impose more restrictions than the original author intended. For the patches I post to the list I assmue a public domain license/no license. Putting the patches themselves under GPL would be a restriction of thise license. But of course you can bundle them with other GPL licenses and licence the whole package as GPL.
Of course sometimes I post abstractions from libraries that have a different license. [list]-abs for example has a Pd-style license.
i have used Franks list-abs a lot but i can't use it as abstraction in netpd since 1) list-abs is no dependency of plain netpd. 2) list-abs of corse come without version tags, then they would be treated as if they had a [version 0.0.0( tag. but if a bug gets fixed this abstraction wouldn't get updated in netpd. don't see an other way than adapt it and use it in a subpatch.
I cannot really help with that. The [list]-abs won't get version numbers, as there may be many different formats of numbers showing up. Of course you could bundle [list]-abs with netpd as well as a requirement.
But then, some list-abs are quite simple/short, so putting them into subpatches is a valid approach as well.
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__