Similarly with encapsulation, I am still thinking that being able to encapsulate a selected group of objects into a pd object while preserving the connections would be great.  From there, it's not too difficult to create an abstraction either.
 
I really like that justification of 'decoupling' the iemGUI, Hans.  That's EXACTLY why it's a good idea.
 
~Kyle

 
On 12/15/06, Frank Barknecht <fbar@footils.org> wrote:
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

> From what I gather you are looking for, a libdir is almost ready for
> that.  AFAIK, the only missing piece is a mechanism to open a libdir
> like a patch.  I think this could be done in the mybundle-meta.pd
> file.  If Pd loaded that file when it opens a libdir, then you could
> add a tiny bit of code into it to load any other patch you might
> want.  Something like:
>
> [loadbang]
> |
> [; pd open mypatch.pd(

Actually I think opening isn't such a problem, saving as bundle
however is. If I have lots of abstractions in different (lib)dirs,
then currently I'd need to search then by hand.

> I am a big fan of the way that you have done it, Frank, using only
> existing objects.  I think to make the whole thing complete, there
> should be a set of GOP GUI objects with your state saving stuff
> inside.  Then people just use those GOP objects if they want state-
> saving.

Chris McCormick's collection has some of these. (I also have but they
aren't published yet because I'm lazy...)

Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__

_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



--

http://theradioproject.com
http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com

(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
(())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))
))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________
_____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______
((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO