From: Patrice Colet colet.patrice@free.fr To: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Cc: IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 10:41 AM Subject: Re: [PD] opinions on the issue of concurrent implementations (was: getting sample rate of file loaded into an array)
De: "IOhannes m zmölnig" zmoelnig@iem.at On 10/04/2012 05:04 PM, Patrice Colet wrote:
We should use C language only when we need it, in the example of [waveinfo] vs [soundfile_info], both aren't the good way for me, we just need the [binfile] external for reading the header, and all the other stuff can be done into a pd patch.
we don't need [binfile]!
how do you read the header without binfile?
I don't know a way without externals. Anyway, I think you're being trolled. -Jonathan
Pd is proven to be turing complete, so it should be easy enough to write an operating system entirely in Pd (that is: a patch) that will allow you to read/write soundfiles in any desired format.
pd is not even able to read extended precision, that's why pd can't tell about aiff samplerate.
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list