On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
apart from that, i do not see a necessity to use either of these terms. why can't we just use "/bang" for the class (or however you want to call it).
Because if classes have that kind of precedence, and you have a page on a certain concept which happens later to have a class by the same name, you don't want to have to move that content to another page just so that the class gets the main entry.
if someone sees the urge for having selectors in the wiki (which i don't, but that is just me),
How do you want to document things across classes? Because always documenting things class-by-class removes some of the big picture. Perhaps they should be documented in a page called "/object" which would contain everything common to all t_objects, for example. Most classes don't define a method for every one of the built-in selectors, but some aspects of those methods/selectors are still defined at that level rather than in the class that defines the method.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada