On Mit, 2012-09-26 at 08:58 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Can somebody confirm this? Because the patch is still "open" on the tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1543850&group_id=557...
If you mean by 'confirm' to test it, yeah, it works in Pd-extended. I'd love to see it in Pd as well.
The situation that this feature is working in one flavor but not in the other is a bit unlucky. Contrary to the GUI enhancements, this really renders patches using this feature incompatible with Pd.
Roman
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig@iem.at> To: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 4:59 AM Subject: Re: [PD] creation arg, distinction between 0 and no arg, WAS Re: Splitting Objects -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-09-25 22:22, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > If you use Pd-l2ork there is no need for dirty hacks. > > Using... > > [list append $@] > afaik, this is "standard" Pd-extended. fgmadfr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBiw/oACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvSUjQCg0SYhlJUmQdAwO6R1h0L80eRJ Y6AAoOMippb9RUCbnmcy04urSMPwQ3v/ =hT8g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list