One I get around to it, I'm going to make a release using the current
0.39.3-extended auto-builds. So yeah, I think it's pretty stable.
It's exactly for things like this I worked on Pd-extended, I am glad
it's useful.
.hc
On Sep 14, 2007, at 4:24 PM, Phil Stone wrote:
Hi Hans,
I'm refactoring the synthesizer I released a couple of weeks ago (polywavesynth -- no more camels, Frank!), and I very much want to
use Mr. Peach's OSC object, which are rolled into 0.39.3-ex-rc5. I'm wondering if it's wise, at this point, to require 0.39.3-ex-rc5 for my synth? It seems pretty stable -- it's just that it's still in autobuilds and I don't know if it needs to be frozen before I should specify it -- keeping in mind that it might be novices downloading and using this rc5.I'm also eagerly following the 0.40 autobuilds (or was, until the MacIntel machine disappeared :-) ), and look forward to a stable
release there - but I suppose that's a bit further away, eh?Thanks for what you do with PD-extended; there wouldn't be a chance of an object like polywavesynth being usable by novices without it.
Phil Stone pkstonemusic.com
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and
this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin