On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 02:49:16PM -0500, Larry Troxler wrote:
Of the top of my head, I think FLTK would be a great choice. And, probably because it's small, it seemed to me to be easier to learn than the more full-featured GUI systems (not that that should be a major factor, mind you).
It's small enough to be statically linked (<100K!), and the latest cvs version support "themes", the holly grail of sexiness for all those non PD users out there. No wonder why themes are sometimes called "skins"...
Ok, this is what prompted me to post. I thought that this argument finally got put to rest years ago. Ok, I'll bite : why would using C++ for a given application, result in slower run-time performance than the same thing coded in C?
C++ is a kludge, but not always a bad one. Fltk is a good example. I just compiled version 2-cvs, and the examples are very convincing.
-- Marc