Thank you very much! WIll try this solution out :)


On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu> wrote:
Just play it (tabplay~) into the other one (tabrecord~).  You can do this
at many times 'normal' speed if you want by putting it in a subpatch
with a high sample rate.

cheers
Miller

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 08:58:22AM -0400, Johann Diedrick wrote:
> Hi Pd list-
>
> I have a question about the object arraycopy. It works great, but I'm
> copying an array with 13230000 points (5 minutes of audio at 44,100 hz) and
> it seems very slow. In particular, my patch seems to "lock" up for about
> 2-3 seconds when making the copy. The audio stops for those 2 seconds, and
> the UI seems to lock up. While this isn't a huge game changer for my
> purposes, I wish there was an alternative for this. Is there a better
> solution for making a copy on the fly for an array this big that is faster,
> doesn't lock up the patch or kill the audio for that time period? Maybe
> there is a threaded solution?
>
> I'd love to hear any thoughts on this!
>
> Thanks so much,
>
> -Johann

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list