Em ter., 16 de jan. de 2024 às 13:26, IOhannes m zmoelnig <
zmoelnig@iem.at> escreveu:
On 1/16/24 17:12, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> Em ter., 16 de jan. de 2024 às 05:08, cyrille henry <ch@chnry.net> escreveu:
>
>> Hello,
>> If you want to try scann synthesis, I suggest to try pmpd. specially
>> example 47.
>>
>
> Running this in Extended now, it looks amazing. Do we really need Gem
> though?
not at all.
Gem just does the visualiation, but the actual physical model runs
within pmpd on the CPU.
I figured, but if you actually remove Gem, somehow, sound stops, so it is part of the implementation somehow I guess.
>
> As for pdp, it seems it tries to use the webcam or video sources and I
> don't understand why.
because it does something different.
[pdp_scan~] will scan an image along a trajectory, and convert the
traversed pixels to samples.
it's not really what "scanned synthesis" is referred to in the wikipedia
article and the like.
yeah, doesn't seem so, but it's gotta be related somehow, right?
>
> Would love to dig more in it and provide an external myself but it looks
> quite complex...
or you could just use pmpd?
i don't fully understand the benefit of re-implementing everything that
is already out there.
I guess it depends on each case, sometimes (I actually think most of the times) I do offer something different (with more features) and better resolved, other times it's something simple that doesn't make much sense to require a dependency, but nowadays, with plugdata, there's always an excuse or actual requirement to add something (and I am thinking now of the time and date alternatives that I didn't need or want myself, but someone requested for plugdata).
cheers
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list