Am 23.08.2006 um 03:57 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Max Neupert wrote:
well actually i thought that's anyway impossible, so those values
would be lost. and this would be okay for now.So, what if you just close the patch and reopen it? You can do that
with pd messages, such as "; open filename directory". Or else,
even just restart pd with the same arguments.
hi list, matju,
i think this approach will do what i want. the message is actually:
[; pd open filename directory(
how do i close the patch remotely later?
[; pd close filename(
doesn't do the trick. where do i find a reference for those messages to pd?
inside src/m_glob.c are some hints, but i did not find something to
close a patch.
thanks,
m.
but on the other hand your counter-question implies that i may
just choose from both available options freely..Not necessarily, I just wanted to know whether you had thought
about the losing the state of your objects and whether it mattered
to you.so i would be curious how to do a patch reload at all an then one
were we still have the stored values of the objects...it's not possible without tracking which object is which. This
might be best done with one of pd's state-saving systems.