Does every supported PD platform allow you to a) dynamically load an object that defines a previously defined symbol and b) search for a symbol starting from the last loaded object and going up the dependency chain to the containing object?
I'm not sure if I understand your question. are you talking about C symbols or Pd symbols here?
Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. Mai 2019 um 01:14 Uhr Von: "Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list" pd-list@lists.iem.at An: katja katjavetter@gmail.com Cc: Pd-List pd-list@lists.iem.at Betreff: Re: [PD] Full stop '.' in class namespace
On Saturday, May 11, 2019, 1:16:16 PM PDT, katja katjavetter@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/11/19, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list <pd-list@lists.iem.at[mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at]> wrote:
[...]
- A cautious user will always leverage Pd's general collision avoidance by
prefixing your library's directory name in the object box.
Does prefixing with libdir name avoid collision? Is it the case that Pd can have classes like [cyclone/svf~] and [bsaylor/svf~] loaded simultaneously?
Does every supported PD platform allow you to a) dynamically load an object that defines a previously defined symbol and b) search for a symbol starting from the last loaded object and going up the dependency chain to the containing object? If the answer to both is yes, then the answer to your question is yes. If not, then we're forever stuck with "pddp/pddplink" and friends. (Unless there's a way to use something like the gcc constructor attribute on all platforms.) -Jonathan
Katja
-Jonathan
Cheers, J.
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list%5Bhttps://lists.puredata.info/l...]