10 May
2017
10 May
'17
10 p.m.
On 05/10/2017 09:20 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
I never thought about it - my original intent in -noloadbang was to allow one to open a patch that might be crashing Pd somehow because of a loadbang action (such as a batch process that automatically exits after a fixed time).
right. that's what i think as well; and that's why i also don't know whether it's a bug or not.
I'm not sure what the correct behavior should be.
however: the behaviour did change between 0.46 and 0.47. older versions of Pd would *never* automatically emit a loadbang if the "-noloadbang" flag was given.
gmdsar IOhannes